Page 7 - Emerging Technologies

One of the biggest issues for crossflow filtration is figuring out how to control the loss of permeate flux in the process. Whether using reverse osmosis (RO), ultrafiltration (UF), or microfiltration (MF), the loss due to polarization and membrane fouling prevents many potential users in the biological or chemical processing fields from adopting this method. If you are using crossflow filtration, or considering using it, and fear the effects of permeate loss, then you may want to consider this technique courtesy of North Carolina A&T University and the U.S. National Energy Technology Laboratory. Their study (see here) produced drastically improved results by implementing flow reversal to enhance the membrane flux. They found that by periodically reversing the flow direction of the feed stream at the membrane surface results in prevention and mitigation of membrane fouling. This particular study conducted experiments with bovine serum albumin, Detran T-70, and apple juice. We’d love to

We ran across an interesting patent that involves silver membranes – As part of a system designed to detect and identify chemical and biological contaminants in the air!  In the proposed sampling method and system, the silver membrane is used to capture liquid, solid, and gas constituents that would then be analyzed by means of spectroscopy for contaminants. 

For more versatility, the surface of the membrane can be modified physically or chemically in order to increase the surface area and/or provide specific affinity towards analytes of interest.   For instance, a pure length of silver membrane would trap solid particulate materials while a silver membrane treated with a metal oxide such as magnesium oxide would adsorb volatile organic compounds from a gas or liquid state.   The suitable thickness for the silver membranes is between 10 - 50 microns, with 30 microns being the preferred thickness.  The standard thickness for Sterlitech silver membranes is between 30 - 50 microns.