Monthly Archives: October 2010

Over the years we have seen an increased use of filtration equipment in juice processing, particularly regarding ultrafiltration (UF) or microfiltration (MF)for the clarification of apple juice.  Since it has been demonstrated that membrane filtration can produce yields of 95%-99% - compared to only 80-94% through conventional processes – it is no wonder that filtration methods are growing in prevalence.  The greater yield combined with the reduced time and labor costs have translated to hundreds of thousands of dollars saved for juice processing plants! If you are considering juice filtration, here a couple of tip

One of the biggest issues for crossflow filtration is figuring out how to control the loss of permeate flux in the process. Whether using reverse osmosis (RO), ultrafiltration (UF), or microfiltration (MF), the loss due to polarization and membrane fouling prevents many potential users in the biological or chemical processing fields from adopting this method. If you are using crossflow filtration, or considering using it, and fear the effects of permeate loss, then you may want to consider this technique courtesy of North Carolina A&T University and the U.S. National Energy Technology Laboratory. Their study (see here) produced drastically improved results by implementing flow reversal to enhance the membrane flux. They found that by periodically reversing the flow direction of the feed stream at the membrane surface results